Or as it’s occasionally known, coal burning, is the act of a white woman having sex with a black man.
If you watch a fair few TV shows, as I do – both for entertainment and to better understand the nature of the enemy – you will have seen a lot of it. Indeed, an extra-terrestrial for whom televisual dramas were the only source of information on Western society would be forgiven for thinking that it is the favoured state of affairs. Given that he (or she, or it: let’s be gender-neutral here) would also believe that approximately half of the population were homosexual, he/she/it might wonder how there were any white people remaining at all.
And therein lies the rub.
Be honest. How many young, slim, attractive, desirable white Western women with high sexual market value do you see with black men who are not rich and/or famous?
And yet, on TV, it’s a veritable multicultural orgy. Just off the top of my head, among current TV shows I’ve watched recently, The Americans, Supergirl, 12 Monkeys, Deutschland ’83, Jessica Jones, American Horror Story, Fear the Walking Dead, and Westworld all feature mudsharking by attractive, intelligent, slim white women with non-rich, non-famous black men (we ain’t talking OJ here). There will be many more examples in several more shows.
And let’s not even get into the ads.
Putting aside the annoyance of majority-white viewers who are opposed to mudsharking, this seems to be a commercially-risky venture. Statistics, as well as simple observation, have shown that white women with high SMV and options do not tend toward ordinary black men. Given that these shows are attempting to recreate realism in order to suspend disbelief and sustain viewer interest, quite clearly the portrayal of such a factually inaccurate state of affairs will be a handicap, and cost the show credibility.
So why do the (((producers))) keep putting it in, so to speak?
The answer, of course, is linked to the extra-terrestrial’s view above. It is, in fact, the main thrust of everything that the Western political/media/financial elite has done over the past 50 or 60 years. That effort is to create a vast, rootless, low IQ, miscegenated serf underclass, which the elite can use to maintain its power, wealth and prestige.
Toward that end, a central goal is reducing the number of white people in the West, and increasing the number of non-whites.
There exists the possibility that a homogenous white populace will unite to threaten the ill-gotten power and wealth of the elite, as has happened several times throughout history. Some would say that it is happening right now, with the election of Trump and others like him by a majority of white voters.
It is far less likely that a multiracial populace will unite against its oligarchs. The various groups will spend much of their energies opposing one another, as is the norm in every society in which different ethnicities are forced to share real estate; and furthermore, the lower IQ of third world and third world-descended immigrants makes them easier for the elites to control with TV, social media and other such pap.
Just see the preponderence of fabulously wealthy and corrupt ruling elites throughout the Third World, and the manner in which they control and dominate the penniless serfs that constitute the majority of their national populations. Such dominance and control is what our own elites crave. They don’t care if the serfs look like them; all that matters is that they work for them, for peanuts and without asking questions. Just like in the Third World.
I have no doubt that certain members of the elite would be happy to forcibly sterilise all white men who run a red light or vote for Trump, but luckily we haven’t quite reached that level of societal degeneration yet. They have to be a little smarter about it for the moment. Mass third world immigration is one way to achieve their aim. But miscegenation is a two-fer:white people producing non-white children. Hence the endless promotion and push for it on our screens, regardless of reality.
And why predominantly women, and only attractive ones at that? The opposite situation, of white men with black women (“oil drilling”) is far more scarce on the silver screen; as is that of average, overweight and homely white women – more representative of the norm – with similarly lardy black men.
For the former, we again see the old adage that sperm is cheaper than eggs. A white man can bang a black chick, and still go to produce several more white children with white women. Yet a woman can only get knocked up so many times, and she puts much more of herself into carrying, weaning and raising a baby than does a man. Therefore the great, overriding aim of the establishment – to reduce the number of white people in the West – is better served by targeting white women, rather than white men.
As for the unrealistically attractive white women shown with blacks, this is classic (((Hollywood))) manipulation of the female psyche. Plain, ordinary frumps with low SMV don’t want to watch and identify with people like themselves: they want to aspire, as most women social climbers do, to glamorous women championed and promoted by the media hivemind. They want to look the same, wear the same clothes, and have the same partners as their idols on the screen.
The less positive realities of mudsharking – greater than average chances of single motherhood and physical and drug abuse; the gnawing feeling of having children that look nothing like you, etc – are completely ignored by the establishment (((libmedia))). Unfortunately, many women lack the critical thinking skills to divine these unscreened truths. Hence the necessity for the Alt Right and allied new media to keep plugging away with the shiv of truth and shame, in order to preserve and protect not only individuals involved, but also our society as a whole.
To invert a leftist bleat against them, it’s who we are.